The information gathered in the Shadow Report for Sustainable Development Goals 16.4, 16.5, 16.6 & 16.10 (hereinafter referred to as “the Report”) has been used as an input into two processes.
* At the global level, this information has been used at the High-Level Political Forum in July 2018, which serves as the central United Nations platform for the follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals (hereinafter referred to as “SDGs”). As part of its advocacy plan against corruption, Transparency International has initiated voluntary reviews on the aforementioned SDGs, in order to complement national voluntary reviews submitted in the forum by the states. This initiative has enabled SDG’s monitoring to go beyond the remit of governments, so at to include civil society and other stakeholders, which are able to provide a more independent and objective look on the SDGs implementation progress. This is of crucial importance, since the official assessment of progress made towards the SDG targets relied on data generated by government agencies, particularly national statistics offices. The reliability and credibility of official data may be open to question for two reasons. First, in some settings, national statistics offices may simply be overwhelmed by the task of producing data for 169 targets. Second, politically sensitive targets, such as those related to corruption and governance, require that governments assess their own efficacy. Given the challenges described above, independent analysis is vital to complement and scrutinise official government progress reports related to SDGs 16.4, 16.5, 16.6 and 16.10.
* At a national level, the information generated enabled Transparency International Greece (hereinafter referred to as “TI-G”) to conduct an independent appraisal of Greece’s progress in fighting corruption, tackling illicit financial flows, and improving transparency and access to information, against the targets set for the Greek state though the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.